Donald Trump
Picnews
Donald Trump is now tying the prospect of a U.S.-Iran peace deal to a broader diplomatic push that would require several Arab and Muslim states to normalize relations with Israel, effectively making the agreement conditional on an expansion of the Abraham Accords. The linkage was made public in a Truth Social post and reinforced during a conference call with leaders from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain on May 24, 2026. Trump told them he expects immediate normalization if a deal with Iran is reached, describing the move as mandatory for the settlement to be considered complete.
The logic behind the linkage is straightforward from Trump’s perspective. By pairing an Iran agreement with new normalization deals, he can present the outcome as a net gain for Israel and for regional stability, making it easier to sell to domestic critics who worry about concessions to Tehran. The framing casts the deal not as a standalone compromise with Iran, but as the trigger for a wider realignment that would isolate hardliners in both Tehran and among Arab states that have resisted engagement with Israel. It echoes the approach of his first term, when the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan normalized ties after the Abraham Accords were brokered in 2020.
Reactions from the Arab and Muslim leaders on the call were muted. According to U.S. officials cited by Axios, the request was met with silence, suggesting that many governments were caught off guard by the expectation that security and diplomatic concessions to Iran would be matched by public recognition of Israel. Saudi Arabia’s position remains the most consequential. Riyadh has consistently said that normalization requires a credible path to Palestinian statehood, and officials have shown little appetite for decoupling the two issues even as economic incentives for engagement with Israel have grown.
Iran has rejected the linkage entirely. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran would never recognize Israel and views the demand as an attempt to use diplomacy with Washington as leverage for Israel’s broader regional ambitions. Pakistani officials have similarly pushed back, arguing that the Iran nuclear and security file cannot be bundled with Arab-Israeli normalization because the conflicts have different histories, stakeholders and red lines. For them, forcing the connection risks collapsing both tracks at once.
Trump’s team argues that the timing creates leverage. With negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program said to be in the finalization stage and a memorandum of understanding reportedly largely negotiated, the administration believes it can offer Arab states a tangible return for normalization in the form of reduced Iranian nuclear and missile threats. The deal on the table would reportedly require Iran to surrender enriched uranium and allow expanded inspections, though details on missiles and proxy forces remain unresolved and are a sticking point for Israel.
The political payoff for Trump would be significant if the strategy works. Adding Saudi Arabia and Qatar to the Abraham Accords would transform the diplomatic landscape of the Middle East, giving Israel open ties with the custodian of Islam’s holiest sites and with a major Gulf power that has mediated regional conflicts. It would also allow Trump to claim a legacy achievement that goes beyond the original Accords and positions him as a broker of a new security and economic architecture in the region.
Critics see the approach as overreach. Analysts at the International Crisis Group argue that Trump is trading one difficult objective for another, assuming that a fragile deal with Iran can serve as the anchor for a new Middle East order while ignoring the depth of opposition among Arab publics and governments to normalization without progress on Palestine. Others warn that even if some states sign on quietly, the lack of public buy-in could make the agreements unstable and vulnerable to reversal if regional tensions flare again.
For now, the linkage remains a proposal rather than a finalized condition of the Iran talks. Israeli officials have signaled cautious interest but want firmer guarantees that Iran’s missile program and regional proxy network will be addressed, while Arab states are weighing whether the economic and security benefits outweigh the political cost of moving ahead without a Palestinian agreement. The next few weeks will show whether Trump can convert diplomatic momentum with Iran into a broader normalization push, or whether the two tracks will remain separate as they have for decades.
